From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ahearn v. Carroll

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2003
305 A.D.2d 523 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-08979

Argued April 22, 2003.

May 19, 2003.

In an action to recover damages under RPAPL 861 for cutting trees, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Dillon, J.), dated September 6, 2002, as denied that branch of their motion which was for partial summary judgment on the issue of the defendants' liability for treble damages and, searched the record and granted partial summary judgment in favor of the defendants dismissing their claim for treble damages.

Corbally, Gartland Rappleyea, LLP, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Jon H. Abrams of counsel), for appellants.

Marc D. Orloff, P.C., Goshen, N.Y. (Anthony J. Perna, Jr., of counsel), for respondents.

Before: NANCY E. SMITH, J.P., HOWARD MILLER, BARRY A. COZIER, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which searched the record and granted partial summary judgment in favor of the defendants dismissing the claim for treble damages; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the appellants.

The defendants chopped down a number of trees on a parcel of land owned by the plaintiffs. Triable issues of fact exist as to whether the defendants had a "good-faith reasonable belief in [their] right to harvest the trees" (Hollenbeck v. Genung, 198 A.D.2d 677, 678-679). Further, there are issues of fact as to whether the injury suffered by the plaintiffs through the loss of those trees was "casual and involuntary," so as to preclude an award of treble damages against the defendants (RPAPL 861[a]; see Arnott v. Franzino, 302 A.D.2d 415 [2d Dept, Feb. 10, 2003]; Myers v. NYNEX Corp., 257 A.D.2d 898; Bass v. Catucci, 196 A.D.2d 802; Cunningham v. Brischke, 167 A.D.2d 604, 605-606; cf. Hollenbeck v. Genung, supra; Whitaker v. McGee, 111 A.D.2d 459).

SMITH, J.P., H. MILLER, COZIER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ahearn v. Carroll

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2003
305 A.D.2d 523 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Ahearn v. Carroll

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM AHEARN, ET AL., appellants, v. PHILLIP T. CARROLL, JR., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 19, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 523 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
759 N.Y.S.2d 344

Citing Cases

Zablow v. Disavino

We disagree, and reinstate the cause of action pursuant to RPAPL 861. "Whenever an individual cuts down trees…

Emerick Gross v. Fuller

Thereafter, the Supreme Court trebled the damages with regard to the first tree, but not as to the second…