From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Agor v. Bennett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 1947
271 App. Div. 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

March 24, 1947.

Present — Hagarty, Acting P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ.


In a summary proceeding to recover possession of real property, order of the County Court, Putnam County, dismissing the plaintiff's petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs. It has been correctly held that a single violation of law of the nature alleged herein is insufficient to constitute a use or occupancy of premises for illegal trade or other illegal business. While the petition alleges that there was a violation "on numerous occasions", only one violation appears as a fact; and if it is intended to allege that several violations took place, such facts should be stated more clearly in the petition if a new proceeding be instituted.


Summaries of

Agor v. Bennett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 1947
271 App. Div. 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Agor v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT A. AGOR, Appellant, v. FRED C. BENNETT et al., Copartners…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1947

Citations

271 App. Div. 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Citing Cases

Carroll v. Radoniqi

19 NYCRR 1203.3. He does not dispute that the noise at issue was a short-term use of an electric saw and…

Carroll v. Radoniqi

19 NYCRR 1203.3. He does not dispute that the noise at issue was a short-term use of an electric saw and…