Opinion
Case No. 5:12-CV-04470-LHK-HRL
03-13-2013
ELIZABETH PALISOC AGNIR, Plaintiff, v. THE GRYPHON SOLUTIONS, LLC, a California limited liability company; MICHAEL CHARLES BRKICH, individually and in his official capacity; JAY MICHAEL TENENBAUM, individually and in his official capacity; IAN NATHAN WILLENS, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants.
Fred W. Schwinn Attorney for Plaintiff Keith M. White Attorney for Defendants
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
[ ] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[X] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs that any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.)
Private Process:
[ ] Private ADR (please identify process and provider)The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
_______________________________________________________
[X] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
[ ] other requested deadline_________________________________
Fred W. Schwinn
Attorney for Plaintiff
Keith M. White
Attorney for Defendants
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
[ ] Non-binding Arbitration
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
[X] Mediation
[ ] Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
[X] 90 days from the date of this order.
[ ] other _______________________________
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Lucy H. Koh
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE