From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Advanta Leasing Services v. Laurel Way Spur Petroleum Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 2004
11 A.D.3d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

October 18, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for breach of an equipment lease, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated November 25, 2002, which denied its motion for summary judgment.

Before: Santucci, J.P., Luciano, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The plaintiff met its initial burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting the equipment lease and proof of nonpayment ( see Preferred Capital v. PBK, Inc., 309 AD2d 1168; Canon Fin. Servs. v. Medico Stationery Serv., 300 AD2d 66). In opposition thereto, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Preferred Capital v. PBK, Inc., supra).


Summaries of

Advanta Leasing Services v. Laurel Way Spur Petroleum Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 2004
11 A.D.3d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Advanta Leasing Services v. Laurel Way Spur Petroleum Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ADVANTA LEASING SERVICES, Appellant, v. LAUREL WAY SPUR PETROLEUM CORP. et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 2004

Citations

11 A.D.3d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
782 N.Y.S.2d 677

Citing Cases

Unistar Leasing, Div. of United v. Lipkin

It is hereby ordered that the judgment and order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously…

Unistar Leasing, Div. of United Com v. Betco

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the…