From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adroit Metal Products, Inc. v. Young's Windows

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 1951
279 AD 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion


279 A.D. 580 107 N.Y.S.2d 713 ADROIT METAL PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Respondents, v. YOUNG'S WINDOWS OF AMERICA, INC., et al., Appellants. Supreme Court of New York, First Department. October 30, 1951

         Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered July 26, 1951, in New York County, which denied a motion by defendants to dismiss the complaint.

          Per Curiam.

          In this action for a declaratory judgment, defendants appeal from an order of Special Term denying their motion to dismiss the complaint. On another appeal between the same parties decided herewith (279 A.D. 581) this court unanimously affirms a prior order of Special Term denying plaintiffs' motion to stay arbitration and granting defendants' cross motion to stay this action.

          The contract in question concededly contained a broad arbitration clause submitting 'any' controversy to arbitration. Plaintiffs do not allege that the contract was procured by fraud or duress nor do they ask that it be rescinded or annulled but only that certain paragraphs be declared void and unenforcible including the arbitration clause. On the facts and circumstances of this case, all issues in the controversy between the parties including the validity, application or limitation of the covenants in question, are for the arbitrators who may if they deem it proper decide such issues either in plaintiffs' or defendants' favor. On the coming in of the award the parties will have opportunity to raise any question as to its scope and enforcement. The court in its discretion should not take jurisdiction of this action for declaratory judgment as other forms of relief are available for adjudication of plaintiffs' claims.

          The order appealed from denying defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to defendants-appellants, and the motion granted.

          Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ., concur.          Order unanimously reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellants and the motion granted, and judgment is directed to be entered dismissing the complaint herein, with costs.

Summaries of

Adroit Metal Products, Inc. v. Young's Windows

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 1951
279 AD 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Adroit Metal Products, Inc. v. Young's Windows

Case Details

Full title:ADROIT METAL PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Respondents, v. YOUNG'S WINDOWS OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1951

Citations

279 AD 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
279 App. Div. 580
107 N.Y.S.2d 713

Citing Cases

MATTER OF YOUNG (DESCHLER)

In its Per Curiam opinion on the reversal and the dismissal of the complaint, the court said: "On the facts…

Matter of Glassman v. Bronston

Section 1451 of the Civil Practice Act provides that where the issue involved in an action is referable to…