Summary
affirming dismissal for failure to effect service "for the reasons stated by the district court," where the district court held it had no discretion under Mendez to extend the Rule 4(m) deadline absent good cause, and the plaintiff failed to show good cause
Summary of this case from United States ex rel. Moore v. Cardinal Fin. Co.Opinion
No. 13-1324
11-12-2013
MONISOLA AUGUSTA ADEYEMO; JULIANA ADEYEMI OGUNLUSI, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JOHN F. KERRY, Secretary of the U. S. Department of State; JOSEPH D. STAFFORD, III, Consul General, U. S. Consulate General, Lagos, Defendants - Appellees.
Fatai A. Suleman, AMITY & SULEMAN, P.A., Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Larry D. Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:12-cv-00874-DKC) Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fatai A. Suleman, AMITY & SULEMAN, P.A., Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Larry D. Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Monisola Augusta Adeyemo and Juliana Adeyemi Ogunlusi appeal the district court's order dismissing their civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the doctrine of consular nonreviewability and for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adeyemo v. Kerry, No. 8:12-cv-00874-DKC (D. Md., Feb. 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED