Summary
affirming district court on the basis of its opinion reported at 415 F.Supp. 787, 791-92 (N.D.Ga. 1976)
Summary of this case from Amos v. Glynn County Board of Tax AssessorsOpinion
No. 76-3052.
March 2, 1978.
G. Michael Hartley, Douglasville, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Wm. C. Tinsley, II, Douglasville, Ga., for Douglas Co.
Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., R. Douglas Lackey, H. Perry Michael, Asst. Attys. Gen., Robert S. Stubbs, II, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard L. Chambers, Deputy Atty. Gen., Gerald W. Bowling, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; James C. Hill, Judge.
Before GOLDBERG, GODBOLD, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
Appellants contend that Georgia law does not provide a "plain, speedy, and efficient" remedy in state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1341 for challenging their property tax assessments, and that the district court therefore should not have dismissed their suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We disagree and affirm the district court's dismissal of this suit on the basis of Judge Hill's well-reasoned opinion reported at 415 F. Supp. 787 (D.C.Ga. 1976).
AFFIRMED.