From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Plaza Construction Company

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Apr 2, 1929
145 A. 483 (Md. 1929)

Opinion

[No. 44, January Term, 1929.]

Decided April 2d 1929.

Restrictive Covenants — Extinction.

Restrictive covenants entered into by a grantee of land held not enforcible as against a purchaser of part of such land, the balance of the grantor's land not having been subjected to such restrictions and having been sold under a mortgage to which the restrictions, did not attach, and a large part of the granted land having been subsequently improved in violation of the restrictions.

Decided April 2d 1929.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (O'DUNNE, J.).

Bill by the Plaza Construction Company against Samuel H. Adams. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

The cause was argued before BOND, C.J., URNER, ADKINS, OFFUTT, DIGGES, PARKE, and SLOAN, JJ.

Wirt A. Duvall, Jr., for the appellant.

C. Alex. Fairbank, Jr., with whom was J. Milton Brandt on the brief, for the appellee.


Unreported cases.


Summaries of

Adams v. Plaza Construction Company

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Apr 2, 1929
145 A. 483 (Md. 1929)
Case details for

Adams v. Plaza Construction Company

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL H. ADAMS v . PLAZA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Apr 2, 1929

Citations

145 A. 483 (Md. 1929)
145 A. 483

Citing Cases

Whitmarsh v. Richmond

The reason for the enforcement of a restrictive covenant of the nature of those in this instance has entirely…

Smith v. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, Phoenix

"The reason for the enforcement of a restrictive covenant of the nature of those in this instance has…