From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. City of Poughkeepsie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 2002
296 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-08334

Argued April 15, 2002

July 15, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated July 31, 2001, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Gellert Quartararo, P.C., Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (James M. Fedorchak of counsel), for appellant.

Goldstein Metzger, LLP, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Andrew L. Spitz and Paul J. Goldstein of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff was injured after she fell in a large depression next to a storm drainage grate and catch basin she alleged was located between 99 Cannon Street and 105 Cannon Street in the City of Poughkeepsie. She commenced this action against the City, claiming, inter alia, that the City was negligent in maintaining the catch basin area.

In response to the plaintiff's claim, an employee of the City Department of Public Works stated at an examination before trial that she conducted a search which produced no record of any complaints or notices of defects with respect to Cannon Street, written notice of which is required in order for the City to be held liable for damages for personal injuries (see Poughkeepsie City Charter § 15.03). Where a municipality establishes that it has not received the requisite written notice, it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to submit competent evidence that the municipality affirmatively created the defect (see Gianna v. Town of Islip, 230 A.D.2d 824, 825; Rosenthal v. Village of Quogue, 205 A.D.2d 745; Kaempf v. Town of Hempstead, 170 A.D.2d 652). The plaintiff failed to offer any evidence that the City received prior written notice of the defect, or affirmatively created the defect.

Accordingly, the City's motion for summary judgment should have been granted.

SANTUCCI, J.P., ALTMAN, S. MILLER and McGINITY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Adams v. City of Poughkeepsie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 2002
296 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Adams v. City of Poughkeepsie

Case Details

Full title:JENNIS ADAMS, respondent, v. CITY OF POUGHKEEPSIE, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 15, 2002

Citations

296 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
745 N.Y.S.2d 203

Citing Cases

Pangerl v. Town of North Hempstead

A municipality may demonstrate it's prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by…

Weinstein v. Town of Hempstead

The Town has established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting the…