From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Borders

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 29, 2016
No. ED CV 16-00541-VBF-AS (C.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2016)

Opinion

No. ED CV 16-00541-VBF-AS

08-29-2016

JOHN M. ADAMS, Petitioner, v. DEAN BORDERS (Warden), Respondent.


FINAL JUDGMENT

Pursuant to this Court's contemporaneously issued Order Overruling Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation, Adopting the Report and Recommendation, Denying the Habeas Corpus Petition, Directing the Entry of Separate Final Judgment, Dismissing the Action With Prejudice, and Terminating the Case, final judgment is hereby entered in favor of the respondent and against petitioner John M. Adams. DATED: Monday, August 29, 2016

/s/_________

VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Adams v. Borders

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 29, 2016
No. ED CV 16-00541-VBF-AS (C.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Adams v. Borders

Case Details

Full title:JOHN M. ADAMS, Petitioner, v. DEAN BORDERS (Warden), Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 29, 2016

Citations

No. ED CV 16-00541-VBF-AS (C.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2016)

Citing Cases

Hicks v. Gipson

"Nonetheless, because the Court is ruling in favor of the respondent, then respondent cannot be prejudiced by…

Garza v. Borders

Federal courts have found challenges to resentencing under Proposition 47 lack a federally cognizable basis…