From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acosta v. Winter

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 29, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-1318 (JR) (D.D.C. Jun. 29, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-1318 (JR).

June 29, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This matter is before the Court on defendant's motion to dismiss.

Plaintiff is a former employee of the United States Navy at Subic Bay, Philippines, whose formal employment discrimination claim was dismissed on the ground that he failed to state a claim of reprisal because he is an alien to whom Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), as amended, does not apply. See Compl., Attach. (November 5, 2007 Notice of Dismissal, DON 07-61581-02250) at 1-2. He alleges that he is a dual citizen of the Philippines and of the United States because he was born in 1938 in the Philippine Islands when the Philippine Islands were a United States territory. Compl. at 6. In this action, plaintiff asks the Court to "confirm[] [his] having been born a US citizen" such that the United States Navy "allow[s] [him] to have access under [Title VII]." Id. at 7.

In Licudine v. Winter, 603 F. Supp. 2d 129 (D.D.C. 2009), this Court held that a person who, like plaintiff, was born in the Philippine Islands when the Philippines was a United States territory is neither a citizen nor a national of United States citizen. Id. at 135-36. Such a person, then, is an alien to whom Title VII does not apply. Id.

The Court will grant defendant's motion to dismiss. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.


Summaries of

Acosta v. Winter

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 29, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-1318 (JR) (D.D.C. Jun. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Acosta v. Winter

Case Details

Full title:ROGELIO ACOSTA, Plaintiff, v. DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary of the Navy…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Jun 29, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-1318 (JR) (D.D.C. Jun. 29, 2009)