From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acosta v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 24, 1983
431 So. 2d 715 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 81-2511.

May 24, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Fredricka G. Smith, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Calianne P. Lantz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.


The final judgment of conviction and sentence is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) there was probable cause for the defendant's arrest based on all the facts and circumstances known to the arresting officer, see e.g., State v. Outten, 206 So.2d 392, 397 (Fla. 1968); Skelton v. State, 349 So.2d 193, 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); (b) the search of the passenger compartment of the car which the defendant was driving was reasonably incident to effecting the arrest of the defendant, see e.g., New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, 101 S.Ct. 2860, 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981), even though the search preceded the arrest, as the search was conducted at a time when there was probable cause for the arrest, see e.g., Dixon v. State, 343 So.2d 1345 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977), and (c) the trial court was therefore eminently correct in denying the motion to suppress the fruits of the subject search. See e.g., McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410, 412 (Fla. 1978).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Acosta v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 24, 1983
431 So. 2d 715 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Acosta v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO ACOSTA, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 24, 1983

Citations

431 So. 2d 715 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

T.M. v. State

"The validity of a search of a defendant conducted after probable cause to arrest him has arisen is…

State v. Marthaller

Thus, it is unusual to find a case, such as the one before us, the result of which is not even fairly…