From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Achtziger v. Fuji Copian Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 5, 2003
100 N.Y.2d 548 (N.Y. 2003)

Opinion

372

June 5, 2003.


Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that denied appellant's motion to amend the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.


Summaries of

Achtziger v. Fuji Copian Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 5, 2003
100 N.Y.2d 548 (N.Y. 2003)
Case details for

Achtziger v. Fuji Copian Corp.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM F. ACHTZIGER, Appellant, v. FUJI COPIAN CORP., Respondent, ET AL.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 5, 2003

Citations

100 N.Y.2d 548 (N.Y. 2003)
762 N.Y.S.2d 871
793 N.E.2d 408

Citing Cases

Ward v. Cross County Multiplex

Nor may plaintiff rely on the relation-back doctrine to assert claims against Quincy. The fact that Quincy is…

Vanessa Khedouri, v. Equinox

Further, the record established that ECCI was merely the lessee of the premises and did not operate,…