From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acevedo-Alvarez v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 13, 2014
No. 12-72721 (9th Cir. May. 13, 2014)

Opinion

No. 12-72721 Agency No. A094-372-990

05-13-2014

JUAN JOSE ACEVEDO-ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Juan Jose Acevedo-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") decision denying his application for protection under the Convention Against Torture ("CAT"). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency's denial of relief under CAT, Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency's denial of Acevedo-Alvarez's CAT claim because he failed to demonstrate it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the Nicaraguan government if returned. See id. at 1073; see also Go v. Holder, 640 F.3d 1047, 1054 (9th Cir. 2011) (concluding country reports and petitioner's credible testimony were insufficient to compel the conclusion that petitioner met his burden of proof for CAT). Accordingly, Acevedo-Alvarez's CAT claim fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.


Summaries of

Acevedo-Alvarez v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 13, 2014
No. 12-72721 (9th Cir. May. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Acevedo-Alvarez v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:JUAN JOSE ACEVEDO-ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 13, 2014

Citations

No. 12-72721 (9th Cir. May. 13, 2014)