From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Accardi v. Kaufmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 2011
82 A.D.3d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010-07407.

March 8, 2011.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and injury to property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), entered July 2, 2010, which granted the motion of the defendant Trevor Kaufmann to change the venue of the action from Nassau County to Suffolk County pursuant to CPLR 510 and 511.

Steven Louros, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Hammill, O'Brien, Croutier, Dempsey, Pender Koehler, P.C., Syosset, N.Y. (Anton Piotroski of counsel), for respondent.

Before:Skelos, J.P., Covello, Eng, Chambers and Sgroi, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A demand to change venue based on the designation of an improper county ( see CPLR 510) "shall be served with the answer or before the answer is served" (CPLR 511 [a]; see Thomas v Guttikonda, 68 AD3d 853, 854). Since the defendant Trevor Kaufmann did not serve his demand for a change of venue until after he served his answer, he was not entitled to change venue as of right ( see Thomas v Guttikonda, 68 AD3d at 854; Jeffrey L. Rosenberg Assoc., LLC v Lajaunie, 54 AD3d 813, 816). Thus, his motion became one addressed to the motion court's discretion ( see Thomas v Guttikonda, 68 AD3d at 854; Jeffrey L. Rosenberg Assoc., LLC v Lajaunie, 54 AD3d at 816).

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting Kaufmann's motion to change the venue from Nassau County to Suffolk County. None of the parties resided in Nassau County at the time the action was commenced (see CPLR 503 [a]; Peretzman v Elias, 221 AD2d 192). The plaintiff omitted from the summons the basis for placing the venue in Nassau County, indicating only that he was a resident of New York State ( see CPLR 305 [a]; Peretzman v Elias, 221 AD2d at 192; Philogene v Fuller Auto Leasing, 167 AD2d 178). Further, Kaufmann moved promptly to change venue after ascertaining the plaintiffs true residence ( see O'Connor v Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Ctr., 231 AD2d 700; Philogene v Fuller Auto Leasing, 167 AD2d at 179).


Summaries of

Accardi v. Kaufmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 2011
82 A.D.3d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Accardi v. Kaufmann

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT ACCARDI, Appellant, v. TREVOR KAUFMANN, Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 8, 2011

Citations

82 A.D.3d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 1775
918 N.Y.S.2d 371

Citing Cases

Saint-Louis v. Esposito

That branch of the defendant's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 511(b) to change venue based on the…

Castaneda v. Castaneda

Despite any untimeliness in defendant serving the demand, the court nevertheless retains the discretion to…