From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ABT v. STATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 31, 1991
581 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-3068.

July 3, 1991. Certification and Rehearing July 31, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Robert W. Tyson, Jr., Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tanja Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm appellant's convictions and sentence except for that part of the sentence that imposes restitution. We hold that the imposition of restitution for the first time on remand constituted a prohibited enhanced sentence. See North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); see also Morganti v. State, 573 So.2d 820 (Fla. 1991). We reverse the imposition of restitution and remand with instructions for the trial court vacate that part of the sentence. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

ABT v. STATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 31, 1991
581 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

ABT v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:ALAN ANDREW ABT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 31, 1991

Citations

581 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Jones v. State

Appellant claims that the court erred in ordering restitution to an insurance company for amounts paid to the…

Savory v. State

This is permissible. Hatcher v. State, 591 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); In the Interest of B.M., 580 So.2d…