From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abreu v. Vonce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 30, 2010
76 A.D.3d 1149 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 507803

September 30, 2010.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Cahill, J.), entered July 16, 2009 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition.

Carlos Abreu, Comstock, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Julie M. Sheridan of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Peters, J.P., Lahtinen, Malone Jr., Stein and Egan Jr., JJ.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding alleging that he was denied due process, equal protection and his 8th Amendment rights in connection with his confinement in the special housing unit. Supreme Court (Lynch, J.), as relevant here, signed an amended order to show cause directing petitioner to serve the petition, exhibits and any supporting affidavits upon each named respondent and the Attorney General on or before February 6, 2009. Respondents moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that, among others, petitioner failed to gain personal jurisdiction over them by not complying with the service requirements of the amended order to show cause. Supreme Court (Cahill, J.) granted the motion and dismissed the petition. Petitioner now appeals.

"[A]n inmate's failure to serve papers in accordance with the directives set forth in an order to show cause will result in dismissal of the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction, unless the inmate can demonstrate that imprisonment presented an obstacle to compliance" ( Matter of Ciochenda v Department of Correctional Servs., 68 AD3d 1363, 1363; see Matter of Green v Selsky, 50 AD3d 1405, 1406, lv denied 10 NY3d 716). Here, the affidavits of service submitted by petitioner evidenced that he did not attempt to make proper service on respondents until February 18, 2009. While petitioner contends that he did not receive the amended order to show cause until February 10, 2009, he has submitted no proof to substantiate this claim. As such, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Abreu v. Vonce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 30, 2010
76 A.D.3d 1149 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Abreu v. Vonce

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CARLOS ABREU, Appellant, v. HAWLEY VONCE, as Correction…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 30, 2010

Citations

76 A.D.3d 1149 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 6732
907 N.Y.S.2d 721

Citing Cases

Encarnacion v. LaValley

When petitioner failed to comply with the service requirements of the order, respondents moved to dismiss the…

Matter of Encarnacion v. Lavalley

Here, petitioner's affidavit of service demonstrates that he did not make service on any of the respondents…