From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abrams v. New York Found. for the Homeless

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 11, 1993
190 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

February 11, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.).


The mere utterance of First Amendment privileges by a purported eleemosynary organization cannot shield defendants from the scrutiny of the Attorney-General (Ohio Civ. Rights Commn. v Dayton Schools, 477 U.S. 619), and the Attorney-General is clearly empowered to supervise charitable corporations (in which category defendants claim the Foundation belongs), and to enjoin them from soliciting funds improperly (EPTL 8-1.4). Defendants' persistent and willful defiance of the Supreme Court subpoena warrants the finding of contempt.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Ross and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Abrams v. New York Found. for the Homeless

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 11, 1993
190 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Abrams v. New York Found. for the Homeless

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT ABRAMS, as Attorney-General of the State of New York, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 11, 1993

Citations

190 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Citing Cases

People v. VDARE Found.

The subpoena does not impermissibly infringe on respondent's or its vendors' and contractors' First Amendment…