From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abby v. Paige

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Feb 4, 2014
553 F. App'x 970 (11th Cir. 2014)

Summary

finding that a second award of "additional damages" was not warranted

Summary of this case from Mendoza v. Capital Accounts, LLC

Opinion

No. 13-10630 D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-23589-JLK

02-04-2014

FELICE ABBY, Individually and on behalf of all similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBERT PAIGE, WINDY POINTE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendants-Appellees.


[DO NOT PUBLISH]


Non-Argument Calendar


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

The district judge, in an opinion analyzing each issue between the parties, rendered judgments in favor of plaintiff and defendant. We have carefully reviewed the opinion accompanying those results, the exhaustive record, and the brief of each party.

Finding no error, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Abby v. Paige

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Feb 4, 2014
553 F. App'x 970 (11th Cir. 2014)

finding that a second award of "additional damages" was not warranted

Summary of this case from Mendoza v. Capital Accounts, LLC
Case details for

Abby v. Paige

Case Details

Full title:FELICE ABBY, Individually and on behalf of all similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 4, 2014

Citations

553 F. App'x 970 (11th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Mendoza v. Capital Accounts, LLC

The Court finds that double recovery is not appropriate. See, e.g., Abby v. Paige, No. 10-23589-CIV, 2013 WL…

Kottler v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc.

It also is irrelevant whether [the defendant] intended to mislead her." Abby v. Paige , No. 10-23589-CIV,…