From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abbott Morgan v. Aberdeen Petroleum Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 15, 1974
46 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

October 15, 1974


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 29, 1974, and judgment entered thereon on February 1, 1974, granting summary judgment, modified, on the law, to grant summary judgment for the reasonable value of plaintiff's services and direct an assessment, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Plaintiff established its right to recover for legal fees. Special Term correctly decided that the court had jurisdiction over the defendant ( Strasser, Spiegelberg, Fried Frank v. Schlesinger, 53 Misc.2d 78, affd. 28 A.D.2d 828; Elman v. Belson, 32 A.D.2d 422). Plaintiff, however, did not establish an account stated. The bills sent by plaintiff were not itemized and their mere retention does not show an accord on the reasonableness of the charges.

Concur — Murphy, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.; Nunez, J.P., and Kupferman, J., dissent and vote to affirm.


Summaries of

Abbott Morgan v. Aberdeen Petroleum Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 15, 1974
46 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

Abbott Morgan v. Aberdeen Petroleum Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BREED, ABBOTT MORGAN, Respondent, v. ABERDEEN PETROLEUM CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1974

Citations

46 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

Yannelli, Zevin Civardi v. Sakol

At the very least, more than one inference is "rationally possible." The final version of the bill, which…

Ruskin, Moscou, Evans Faltischek v. Beal

Indeed, a former partner in the plaintiff firm conceded in an affidavit that Beal had expressed his dismay at…