From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aana v. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int'l, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Aug 16, 2012
CIVIL NO. 12-00231 JMS/BMK (D. Haw. Aug. 16, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 12-00231 JMS/BMK

08-16-2012

JIM AANA, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on July 24, 2012, and no objections having been filed by any party,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Findings and Recommendations That Plaintiffs' Motion To Remand Be Denied" are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, August 16, 2012.

_________________

J. Michael Seabright

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Aana v. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int'l, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Aug 16, 2012
CIVIL NO. 12-00231 JMS/BMK (D. Haw. Aug. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Aana v. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int'l, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JIM AANA, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Date published: Aug 16, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 12-00231 JMS/BMK (D. Haw. Aug. 16, 2012)

Citing Cases

Evangelista v. Just Energy Mktg. Corp.

Additionally, the mere fact that Plaintiff seeks relief from all Defendants jointly and severally, without…

Evangelista v. Just Energy Mktg. Corp.

The mere fact that Plaintiff seeks relief from all Defendants jointly and severally, without any factual…