From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

850 Company v. Schwartz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 11, 1965
15 N.Y.2d 899 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Argued February 4, 1965

Decided March 11, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MITCHELL D. SCHWEITZER, J.

David W. Peck, David Bergner, Gerald Blum and E. Roger Frisch for appellant.

Jack Newton Lerner for respondents.


Order reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the order of Special Term reinstated. Petitioner, by virtue of having converted and leased 60% of its building as business space, having timely made application for certificates of decontrol, having obtained a certificate of occupancy, and having instituted this proceeding, had a right "accruing" within the meaning of section 93 of the General Construction Law ( Cameron v. New York Mount Vernon Water Co., 133 N.Y. 336, 341).

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

850 Company v. Schwartz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 11, 1965
15 N.Y.2d 899 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

850 Company v. Schwartz

Case Details

Full title:850 COMPANY, Appellant, v. ADELE M. SCHWARTZ et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 11, 1965

Citations

15 N.Y.2d 899 (N.Y. 1965)
258 N.Y.S.2d 428
206 N.E.2d 361

Citing Cases

W. Side Inv'rs v. Wee

The Court of Appeals has interpreted General Construction Law § 93 to permit enforcement of rights accrued…

Matter of Shafer v. Gabel

Term, N.Y. County, MARKOWITZ, J.], affd. 23 A.D.2d 537, mot. for lv. to app. den. 15 N.Y.2d 486; 850 Corp. v.…