From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

68-74 Thompson v. McNally

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 2008
20 Misc. 3d 14 (N.Y. App. Term 2008)

Opinion

No. 570599/06.

May 12, 2008.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jean T. Schneider, J.), entered December 1, 2005. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded possession to petitioner in a holdover summary proceeding.

David A. Kaminsky Associates, P.C., New York City ( David A. Kaminsky of counsel), for appellant. McGovern Associates, New York City ( Kyu O. Kim of counsel), for respondent.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Final judgment, entered December 1, 2005, reversed, with $30 costs, and final judgment awarded to respondent Harry McNally dismissing the holdover petition.

The evidence presented at the trial of this holdover summary proceeding showed, and the trial court expressly found, that respondent Harry McNally, the son of the now departed stabilized tenant, "spent at least four or five nights a week and often more" in the apartment with his father from 1993 until 2002, when tenant vacated, and that Harry, then 17 years old, continued to live in the apartment by himself after his father's vacatur, with the exception of a short stint in college from August 2003 to the spring of 2005. These factual findings, fully supported by the record, compel the conclusion that Harry primarily resided in the apartment for the requisite two-year period prior to his father's vacatur, thus entitling Harry to succeed to his father's tenancy ( see Rent Stabilization Code [ 9 NYCRR] 2523.5 [b] [1]; Hughes v Lenox Hill Hosp., 226 AD2d 4, 11, lv dismissed 90 NY2d 829).

Given the court's own findings concerning Harry's actual use of the apartment premises, the fact that the 1994 separation agreement between tenant and Harry's mother provided that Harry and his siblings "shall make their primary residence" with their mother does not negate the persuasive succession claim here established, especially considering that the separation agreement awarded both parents joint custody of the children ( cf. Quiala v Loafer, 180 AD2d 31, lv dismissed 80 NY2d 924).

McKEON, P.J., DAVIS and HEITLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

68-74 Thompson v. McNally

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 2008
20 Misc. 3d 14 (N.Y. App. Term 2008)
Case details for

68-74 Thompson v. McNally

Case Details

Full title:68-74 THOMPSON REALTY, LLC, Respondent, v. KEITH McNALLY, Respondent, and…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 12, 2008

Citations

20 Misc. 3d 14 (N.Y. App. Term 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 28180
862 N.Y.S.2d 692

Citing Cases

68-74 Thompson v. McNally

April 28, 2009. Appeal from the App Term, 1st Dept: 20 Misc 3d 14. Appeals Dismissed Pursuant to Rules of…

68-74 Thompson Realty v. McNally

Upon our review of the documentary and other evidence, we find, contrary to the view of the Appellate Term,…