From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

644 BRDY Realty, Inc. v. 684 Owners Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 8, 1995
216 A.D.2d 43 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 8, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.).


Order, same court and Justice, entered on or about November 4, 1994 which granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint seeking damages for wrongful eviction and imposing a $5,000 sanction against plaintiffs' attorney for frivolous litigation, and judgment entered thereon on November 14, 1994, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Following more than five years of litigation, it was finally determined that defendant 684 Owners Corp. was entitled to possession of the ground floor commercial space from the tenant, Scarab Equities Corp., as well as a money judgment for rent arrears. Scarab Equities Corp. is an entity controlled entirely by Martin Fine, Esq. who also controls the plaintiffs in these actions. Mr. Fine's attempt to revive the tenancy through the plaintiff entities and to seek damages for wrongful eviction was properly summarily dismissed by the IAS Court inasmuch as the court had before it the entire prior history of this landlord-tenant dispute which clearly demonstrated that plaintiffs have no bona fide claim as tenant or sub-tenant. Accordingly we agree that Mr. Fine was properly sanctioned for this frivolous litigation.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rubin, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

644 BRDY Realty, Inc. v. 684 Owners Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 8, 1995
216 A.D.2d 43 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

644 BRDY Realty, Inc. v. 684 Owners Corp.

Case Details

Full title:644 BRDY REALTY, INC., Appellant, v. 684 OWNERS CORP., Respondent. 644…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 8, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 43 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 662

Citing Cases

Mayer v. Vilar

Conduct is frivolous under 22 NYCRR §130-1.1(c)(1) if it is "completely without merit in law and cannot be…

Herman v. Pound W. Trading Corp.

Sanctions are appropriately awarded where there is no bona fide basis for a claim; where a party ignores…