From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

437 Palisade Ave. Realty v. Boyd

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 15, 1984
124 Misc. 2d 759 (N.Y. App. Term 1984)

Opinion

May 15, 1984

Appeal from the City Court of Yonkers, Westchester County, John Emmett Murphy, J.

Ecker Ecker ( Lawrence H. Ecker and Joan Iacono of counsel), for appellant.

Farrauto, Berman Fontana ( John P. Farrauto of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

Since the stipulation was entered into on the record, on the advice of counsel, and in settlement of a bona fide dispute, the "no-waiver" provisions of section 11 of the Emergency Tenant Protection Act (L 1974, ch 576, § 4) and section 2500.12 of the Emergency Tenant Protection Regulations (9 N.Y.CRR) are not applicable (see Matter of Matinzi v Joy, 60 N.Y.2d 835; Hill v Wek Capital Corp., 4 A.D.2d 615; Rega v Joy, NYLJ, Aug. 25, 1982, p 11, col 1). Furthermore, the circumstances are not such as to warrant relieving tenant from the terms of the stipulation (see Hill v Wek Capital Corp., supra).

FARLEY, P.J., SLIFKIN and GEILER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

437 Palisade Ave. Realty v. Boyd

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 15, 1984
124 Misc. 2d 759 (N.Y. App. Term 1984)
Case details for

437 Palisade Ave. Realty v. Boyd

Case Details

Full title:437 PALISADE AVENUE REALTY CORP., Respondent, v. MARY BOYD, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: May 15, 1984

Citations

124 Misc. 2d 759 (N.Y. App. Term 1984)
480 N.Y.S.2d 75

Citing Cases

Merwest Realty Corp v. Prager

These cases hold that an agreement to surrender does not violate the prohibition against waiver of the…

Grasso v. Matarazzo [2d Dept 1999

Section 26-408(a) of the New York City Rent and Rehabilitation Law (commonly known as the Rent Control Law)…