From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

2833 Third Avenue Realty Associates v. Marcus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 2004
12 A.D.3d 329 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4740

November 30, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered on or about December 18, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants' motion for summary judgment and declared that defendant Public Service Mutual Insurance Company shall defend and indemnify plaintiff 2833 Third Avenue Realty Associates in the underlying personal injury action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Friedman and Catterson, JJ.


Although plaintiff insureds failed to provide timely notice of claim and forward the summons and complaint as required by the policy, defendants' disclaimer after 37 days was unreasonable as a matter of law since the grounds for the disclaimer were evident from the face of the late notice of claim ( see West 16th St. Tenants Corp. v. Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co., 290 AD2d 278).


Summaries of

2833 Third Avenue Realty Associates v. Marcus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 2004
12 A.D.3d 329 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

2833 Third Avenue Realty Associates v. Marcus

Case Details

Full title:2833 THIRD AVENUE REALTY ASSOCIATES et al., Respondents, v. JACK MARCUS et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 30, 2004

Citations

12 A.D.3d 329 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
784 N.Y.S.2d 863

Citing Cases

Pav-Lak Indus., Inc. v. Arch Ins. Company.

er, Zurich informed Arch that the "claimant, an employee of your subcontractor, Ranger Steel, fell from a…

Ace Pkg. Co. v. Campbell Solberg Assoc., Inc.

In most cases, the timeliness of an insurer's notice of disclaimer "will be a question of fact, dependent on…