From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

244 West 27th St. Corp. v. Lieberman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 28, 1947
272 App. Div. 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

November 28, 1947.

Appeal from Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, CURTIN, J.

Emanuel M. Cohn of counsel ( Abraham Michaelson with him on the brief), for appellant.

Sim C. Binder for respondent.


The landlord in this summary proceeding seeks to recover possession of certain business premises for the use of a stockholder allegedly owning more than 90% of its capital stock. Such a proceeding is authorized by clause (2) of subdivision (h) of section 8 of the Business Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 314, § 8, as amd. by L. 1945, ch. 432 and L. 1946, ch. 273, § 2). No proof was offered to show that the corporate landlord had an equity in the property amounting to 25% of the purchase price. If the proceeding had been brought to obtain possession for the corporate owner itself, such proof would be requisite under the express provisions of subdivision (d) of the statute. The question presented is whether the omission of a similar requirement from subdivision (h) obviates the necessity for establishing the existence of a 25% equity in the property where possession is sought for a stockholder of the corporation.

We think that subdivision (d) and clause (2) of subdivision (h) must be read together in this respect. It would seem unreasonable to suppose that the Legislature intended to afford greater or different rights in this regard where the proceeding is brought by a corporate owner to recover possession for its stockholder than in a proceeding to recover possession for itself.

While the final order of the Municipal Court was reversed on different grounds which may not be tenable under the present status of the law, we find that the determination of the Appellate Term was correct for the reasons above indicated.

We do not pass upon the question as to the sufficiency of the proof of good faith.

The determination of the Appellate Term, so far as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

GLENNON, J.P., COHN, CALLAHAN and VAN VOORHIS, JJ., concur.

Determination, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

244 West 27th St. Corp. v. Lieberman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 28, 1947
272 App. Div. 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

244 West 27th St. Corp. v. Lieberman

Case Details

Full title:244 WEST 27TH STREET CORPORATION, Appellant, v. SOPHIE LIEBERMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 28, 1947

Citations

272 App. Div. 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
74 N.Y.S.2d 763

Citing Cases

St. Nicholas Sports Center v. Lincoln Sq. Center

We think that they should be so read. By enlarging the class of persons authorized to maintain proceedings…

Rubinstein Bros. v. Olé of 34th Street, Inc.

One can certainly not be implied, however. The adoption in New York of the rule of these cases is supported…