Opinion
April 1, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan J. Saks, J.).
Sufficient "special circumstances" were demonstrated to warrant the discontinuance of this foreclosure action on a second mortgage in favor of an action at law on the underlying debt, namely, the extreme unlikelihood that foreclosure will satisfy the debt owing to plaintiff in view of the amount of the first mortgage, which is also in default, as well as the fire that occurred at the subject premises (see, Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v 400 Garden City Assocs., 150 Misc.2d 247; Stein v Nellen Dev. Corp., 123 Misc.2d 268).
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Ellerin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.