From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

20-22 PRINCE LLC v. TSUE KWAI YEN

Civil Court of the City of New York. NY County
Jun 6, 2011
32 Misc. 3d 1224 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2011)

Opinion

June 6, 2011.


Landlord and Tenant — Rent Regulation — Succession Rights — Evidence of Living Arrangements. Evidence — Hearsay Evidence — Third-party statements in certified medical records were admissible so long as statements related to treatment or discharge of patient. Civil Practice Law and Rules — § 2219 (a) (Time and form of order).


Summaries of

20-22 PRINCE LLC v. TSUE KWAI YEN

Civil Court of the City of New York. NY County
Jun 6, 2011
32 Misc. 3d 1224 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2011)
Case details for

20-22 PRINCE LLC v. TSUE KWAI YEN

Case Details

Full title:20-22 Prince LLC v. Tsue Kwai Yen

Court:Civil Court of the City of New York. NY County

Date published: Jun 6, 2011

Citations

32 Misc. 3d 1224 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 51414

Citing Cases

In re Raheem D.

In Feinstein, the court ruled in a civil action that statements made by a patient's son were admissible under…

In re A.M.

The court found that “[t]he trustworthiness of the son's statements to the house doctor are [sic]…