From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

143 E. 30th St. Corp. v. Shankman

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York. First Department
Nov 21, 2005
10 Misc. 3d 126 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In 143 East 30th Street Corp. v Shankman (10 Misc 3d 126 [A], 2005 NY Slip Op 51883 [U], *1 [App Term 1st Dept, Nov. 21, 2005]), similarly, the court determined that the tenant qualified as a permanent tenant based on his "continuous occupancy of the building premises as a primary residence for a period exceeding the six-month statutory threshold."

Summary of this case from Brianic Intl. Realty Corp. v. Pitt
See 1 Summary

Opinion

November 21, 2005.

Landlord and Tenant — Rent Regulation — Rent Overcharge. Appeal — Law of the Case.

Summaries of

143 E. 30th St. Corp. v. Shankman

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York. First Department
Nov 21, 2005
10 Misc. 3d 126 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)

In 143 East 30th Street Corp. v Shankman (10 Misc 3d 126 [A], 2005 NY Slip Op 51883 [U], *1 [App Term 1st Dept, Nov. 21, 2005]), similarly, the court determined that the tenant qualified as a permanent tenant based on his "continuous occupancy of the building premises as a primary residence for a period exceeding the six-month statutory threshold."

Summary of this case from Brianic Intl. Realty Corp. v. Pitt
Case details for

143 E. 30th St. Corp. v. Shankman

Case Details

Full title:143 E. 30TH ST. CORP. v. SHANKMAN

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York. First Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2005

Citations

10 Misc. 3d 126 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51883

Citing Cases

Zawistowski v. Parnian

A landlord claiming that the premises are exempt from rent regulation bears the burden of proving its claim.…

Dexter 345, Inc. v. Hanlon

Carlyle Johnson v. Richard Crandell a/k/a Richard Crendell, 19 Misc 3d 1136(A) (2008). 143 E. 30th St. Corp.…

5 Citing Cases