From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

1420 Assoc. v. Modern Landfill Recycling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1998
256 A.D.2d 538 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 28, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.),


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the matter is remitted for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

In November 1995 a judgment previously obtained in New Jersey in favor of, among others, the defendant Broad National Bank (hereinafter Broad National) and against, among others, the third party defendants Nestor Alzerez, Jr., and Ridgeway Foods, Inc., was entered in the Supreme Court in Westchester County. In January 1998 Broad National served a restraining notice pursuant to CPLR 5222 upon nonparty Chase Manhattan Bank (hereinafter Chase). Broad National asserted that an account at Chase held property in which one or more of the judgment debtors had an interest.

By order to show cause dated March 23, 1998, the intervenor-respondent, Ridgeway Food Corp., sought to vacate the restraining notice. Ridgeway Food Corp. asserted that it was the owner of the subject Chase account and was an entity separate and distinct from the judgment debtor Ridgeway Foods, Inc. In the order appealed from, the court granted the motion. We now reverse.

In addition to the named corporate judgment debtor, the third-party defendant Nestor Alzerez, Jr., was named as a judgment debtor on the restraining notice. Here, the record indicates that, although Ridgeway Food Corp. was apparently dissolved in 1996, Alzerez continued to use the corporate name and continued to use the subject account to pay, inter alia, admitted personal expenses. Accordingly, the matter is remitted for a hearing to determine whether Alzerez has an "interest" in the account within the meaning of CPLR article 52 ( see, Ray v. Jama Prods., 74 A.D.2d 845; Cascade Automatic Sprinkler Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 60 A.D.2d 901; Franklin Natl. Bank v. Baron, 37 A.D.2d 566; Hansa Overseas Corp. v. Krawehl, 37 A.D.2d 928).

Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

1420 Assoc. v. Modern Landfill Recycling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1998
256 A.D.2d 538 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

1420 Assoc. v. Modern Landfill Recycling

Case Details

Full title:1420 ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. MODERN LANDFILL AND RECYCLING, a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 28, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 538 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
682 N.Y.S.2d 883

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank v. Wyo Tech Inv. Grp. LLC

In other words, the court declined to order vacatur even though the alter ego status had not yet been…

Thompson v. Pollack

However, the plaintiff submitted evidence demonstrating that, although Athens was apparently dissolved in…