From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

1380 Madison Avenue v. 17 East Owners Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 4, 2004
12 A.D.3d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

3844

November 4, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered October 15, 2003, which granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on its claims for declaratory and injunctive relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.


Defendant failed to establish adverse possession and/or prescriptive easement by reason of its air conditioning units protruding into plaintiff's air space because it was unable to demonstrate that such possession was actual, hostile or under claim of right ( see Joseph v. Whitcombe, 279 AD2d 122; see also Landgray Assoc. v. 450 Lexington Venture, L.P., 788 F Supp 776 [SD NY 1992]). We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

1380 Madison Avenue v. 17 East Owners Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 4, 2004
12 A.D.3d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

1380 Madison Avenue v. 17 East Owners Corp.

Case Details

Full title:1380 MADISON AVENUE, L.L.C., Respondent, v. 17 EAST OWNERS CORP., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 4, 2004

Citations

12 A.D.3d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
783 N.Y.S.2d 473

Citing Cases

N47 Assoc's. v. Jemsco Realty LLC

The aerial encroachments on which Jemsco predicated its claim are wooden spars and iron grates protruding…

N47 Assocs. LLC v. Jemsco Realty LLC

The aerial encroachments on which Jemsco predicated its claim are wooden spars and iron grates protruding…