§

United States Postal Service

241 N.L.R.B. 524 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
United States Postal Service

12 Cited authorities

  1. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  4. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  5. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

  6. Indiana Gear Works v. N.L.R.B

    371 F.2d 273 (7th Cir. 1967)   Cited 23 times
    Posting of ridiculing cartoons merely part of pattern of habitual sarcastic reflections

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Mid-States Metal Products, Inc.

    403 F.2d 702 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 17 times

    No. 23352. November 13, 1968. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J.A. Lake, Greenville, Miss., Leonard A. Keller, Detroit, Mich., Warren S. Gritzmacher, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for respondents. Before RIVES, COLEMAN and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges. GODBOLD, Circuit Judge: The NLRB petitions for enforcement of its order, reported at 156 NLRB 90, against Mid-States Metal Products, Inc., and the Chemical Workers Union. The Board found

  8. Eastex, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    550 F.2d 198 (5th Cir. 1977)   Cited 3 times

    No. 74-4156. April 7, 1977. Tom M. Davis, Houston, Tex., for petitioner-cross respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Louis V. Baldovin, Jr., Regional Director, Region 23, Houston, Tex., for respondent-cross petitioner. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board (Texas case). Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and RIVES and GEE, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge: This

  9. Eastex, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    556 F.2d 1280 (5th Cir. 1977)   Cited 1 times

    No. 74-4156. August 5, 1977. Tom M. Davis, Houston, Tex., for Eastex, Inc. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board (Texas case). Before BROWN, Chief Judge, RIVES and GEE, Circuit Judges. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion April 7, 1977, 5 Cir., 1977, 550 F.2d 198) PER CURIAM: Petitioner-Cross

  10. Maryland Drydock Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    183 F.2d 538 (4th Cir. 1950)   Cited 19 times
    In Maryland Drydock Co. v. NLRB, 183 F.2d 538, 539 (4th Cir. 1950), we held that an employer was entitled to maintain discipline by prohibiting "defamatory and insulting statements which reasonably tend to destroy such discipline....

  11. Section 7311 - Loyalty and striking

    5 U.S.C. § 7311   Cited 103 times
    Governing public officials' conduct regarding loyalty and striking

  12. Section 1201 - Definition

    39 U.S.C. § 1201   Cited 32 times

    As used in this chapter, "guards" means- (1) maintenance guards who, on the effective date of this chapter, are in key position KP-5 under the provisions of former section 3514 of title 39; and (2) security guards, who may be employed in the Postal Service and whose primary duties shall include the exercise of authority to enforce rules to protect the safety of property, mail, or persons on the premises. 39 U.S.C. § 1201 Pub. L. 91-375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 733. EDITORIAL NOTES REFERENCES IN TEXTThe