§
Scatena v. Comm'r

3 Cited authorities

  1. Avery v. Commissioner

    292 U.S. 210 (1934)   Cited 80 times
    In Avery it was clear that Avery would obtain the dividend checks on January 2, whereas here, as we have explained, it was unclear whether the appellants ever would obtain the two pledged certificates of deposit.

  2. Pacific National Bank v. Eaton

    141 U.S. 227 (1891)   Cited 38 times
    In Pacific National Bank v. Eaton, 141 U.S. 227, 233, 234, the court, again speaking by Mr. Justice Bradley, said: "The defendant in error was just as much bound by her subscription to the new stock as if the whole $500,000 had been subscribed and paid in. The only question to be considered, therefore, is whether the fact that the defendant in error did not call for and take her certificate of stock made any difference as to her status as a stockholder.

  3. In re Stoddard Bros. Lumber Co.

    169 F. 190 (D. Idaho 1909)   Cited 4 times

    No Docket Number March 20, 1909 C. H. Finn, Hawley, Puckett Hawley, and Frank Estabrook, for George Stoddard. L. F. Clinton, Neal Kinyon, Griffiths Griffiths, and Rice, Thompson Buckner, for objecting creditors. DIETRICH, District Judge 1. PARTNERSHIP (§ 241*) — RETIRING PARTNER-LIABILITY FOR FIRM DEBTS — ES-TOPPEL. The principle underlying the responsibility of a partner, who retire? without publishing proper notice, to subsequent creditors of the firm, is that of estoppel, Implying that the partner