§

Robbins & Myers, Inc.

241 N.L.R.B. 102 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
Robbins & Myers, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Henry I. Siegel Co. v. N.L.R.B

    417 F.2d 1206 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 10 times
    In Henry I. Siegel, we held that we will examine the context of statements and the atmosphere in which they were made to determine whether they constitute "a permissible forceful argument in opposition to the union or a veiled threat to the employees in the event the union should win the election."

  2. Robbins Myers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    577 F.2d 382 (6th Cir. 1978)   Cited 1 times

    No. 76-2444. June 20, 1978. Frank H. Stewart, Patrick M. Stanton, Taft, Stettinius Hollister, Lawrence J. Barty, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Michael S. Winer, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., James E. Murphy, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, Edward S. Dorsey, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before PECK, ENGEL and MERRITT, Circuit Judges. ORDER Petitioner Company filed the within

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Graber Manufacturing Company Inc.

    382 F.2d 990 (7th Cir. 1967)   Cited 2 times

    No. 16034. September 25, 1967. Marcel-Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Corinna Lothar Metcalf, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Attorney, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Walter S. Davis, Russ R. Mueller, Milwaukee, Wis., Davis, Kuelthau, Vergeront Stover, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondent. Before CASTLE, SWYGERT, and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Brandenburg Telephone Company

    408 F.2d 377 (6th Cir. 1969)

    No. 18511. March 12, 1969. Glenn M. Bendixsen, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Hans J. Lehmann, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. James U. Smith, Jr., Louisville, Ky., for respondent, Louis E. Woolery, Louisville, Ky., Stuart Rothman, Washington, D.C., on brief, Smith Smith, Louisville, Ky., Royall, Koegel, Rogers Wells, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Before PHILLIPS