Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC

8 Cited authorities

  1. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.

    500 U.S. 90 (1991)   Cited 1,231 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding parties' legal theories not binding on Court, which "retains the independent power to identify and apply the proper construction of governing law"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct
  4. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  6. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Martin

    954 F.2d 353 (6th Cir. 1992)   Cited 61 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that former version of statute protected employees who complain about “possible safety violations”
  7. Chevron Mining, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    684 F.3d 1318 (D.C. Cir. 2012)   Cited 19 times
    Reexamining precedent in light of recent Supreme Court decisions and reaching the same conclusion
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Homer D. Bronson Co.

    273 F. App'x 32 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 1 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 07-2447-ag. April 10, 2008. Application of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its Order, dated March 16, 2007, against Homer D. Bronson Company. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the application is GRANTED. Robert J. Englehart, Supervisory Attorney, Ruth E. Burdick, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, (Ronald Meisburg, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda