Mooresville Cotton Mills

2 Cited authorities

  1. McClelland v. Climax Hosiery Mills

    252 N.Y. 347 (N.Y. 1930)   Cited 136 times
    Noting that injured party who "unreasonably reject" cannot then "be heard to say that the loss . . . shall be deemed the jural consequence of the" wrongful act
  2. Hussey v. Holloway

    104 N.E. 471 (Mass. 1914)   Cited 10 times

    January 14, 1914. February 27, 1914. Present: RUGG, C.J., BRALEY, SHELDON, De COURCY, CROSBY, JJ. Damages, In contract. Evidence, Materiality. In an action against a milliner for the breach of a contract to employ the plaintiff as trimmer during a certain season at $18 a week, it is no ground for reducing the plaintiff's damages that she refused to accept an offer of the defendant to employ her in a different way, if the offer did not define the work or name the rate of wages or the period of employment