Mine Workers District 29

7 Cited authorities

Facet Enterprises, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
907 F.2d 963 (10th Cir. 1990) Cited 30 times
In Facet Enterprises, we reasoned "[t]he policies underlying [§ 160(e)], i.e., notice, efficiency and providing the Board with the first opportunity to consider a claim, would have been undermined had the Supreme Court allowed judicial review" in Woelke & Romero and Garment Workers' Union.
Alexander Dawson, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
586 F.2d 1300 (9th Cir. 1978) Cited 40 times
Holding "the content of a document, when considered with the circumstances surrounding its discovery, is an adequate basis for [its authentication]"
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. N.L.R.B
407 F.2d 1357 (4th Cir. 1969) Cited 38 times
Noting that, while timing is a factor, "the thrust of Exchange Parts is the condemnation of granting such benefits with the purpose of affecting the outcome of an election"
N.L.R.B. v. Quality C.A.T.V., Inc.
824 F.2d 542 (7th Cir. 1987) Cited 5 times
Nos. 86-1811, 86-1988. Argued February 10, 1987. Decided June 29, 1987. Judith Dowd, N.L.R.B., Elliott Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Stephen C. Cline, Peterson, Haramy, Cline Shoup, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before WOOD and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges, and ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge. ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board ("Board") has filed a petition asking this court to enforce an order of the Board, which held that respondent, Quality
American Boiler Manufacturers v. N.L.R.B
366 F.2d 815 (8th Cir. 1966) Cited 21 times
In American Boiler, the complaint alleged a fabrication clause in a collective-bargaining contract was being unlawfully applied by the parties, but the issue of legality of the clause was not passed on by the Board, even though the validity of the clause would be dispositive and was fully litigated by the parties; this Court remanded to the Board to determine the legality of the clause.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Am. Tube Bending Co.
205 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1953) Cited 3 times
Holding that an employer was not entitled to a rehearing before the Board concerning a violation found by the ALJ that had not been charged in the complaint and that had not been considered or argued by either party
Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 Cited 94,179 times 92 Legal Analyses
Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint

Mine Workers District 29

7 Cited authorities

Facet Enterprises, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

In Facet Enterprises, we reasoned "[t]he policies underlying [§ 160(e)], i.e., notice, efficiency and providing the Board with the first opportunity to consider a claim, would have been undermined had the Supreme Court allowed judicial review" in Woelke & Romero and Garment Workers' Union.

Alexander Dawson, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

Holding "the content of a document, when considered with the circumstances surrounding its discovery, is an adequate basis for [its authentication]"

Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. N.L.R.B

Noting that, while timing is a factor, "the thrust of Exchange Parts is the condemnation of granting such benefits with the purpose of affecting the outcome of an election"

N.L.R.B. v. Quality C.A.T.V., Inc.

American Boiler Manufacturers v. N.L.R.B

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Am. Tube Bending Co.

Holding that an employer was not entitled to a rehearing before the Board concerning a violation found by the ALJ that had not been charged in the complaint and that had not been considered or argued by either party

Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint