§

MIKLIN ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A JIMMY JOHN'S

18-CA-019707 (N.L.R.B. Apr. 19, 2012)
MIKLIN ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A JIMMY JOHN'S

11 Cited authorities

  1. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union

    466 U.S. 485 (1984)   Cited 1,626 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the clear-error standard "does not inhibit an appellate court's power to correct errors of law, including ... a finding of fact that is predicated on a misunderstanding of the governing rule of law"

  2. DeBartolo Corp. v. Fla. Gulf Coast Trades Council

    485 U.S. 568 (1988)   Cited 729 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union’s distribution of handbills at the entrances of a shopping mall was not threatening, coercing, or restraining within meaning of section 8(b) because there had been "no violence, picketing, or patrolling," and "no suggestion that the leaflets had any coercive effect on customers of the mall"

  3. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  4. Arroyo v. United States

    359 U.S. 419 (1959)   Cited 164 times
    Noting the purpose behind § 302 is to promote “the integrity of the collective bargaining process”

  5. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

  6. Jolliff v. N.L.R.B

    513 F.3d 600 (6th Cir. 2008)   Cited 24 times
    In Jolliff, we canvassed the tests and approaches of other circuits and created a framework for ascertaining whether a defamatory meaning can be gleaned from the allegedly defamatory statement.

  7. Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 6 times
    Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning

  8. Endicott Interconnect Techn. v. N.L.R.B

    453 F.3d 532 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 8 times
    Finding that Mountain Shadows Golf "accurately reflects the holding in Jefferson Standard "

  9. Caterpillar, Inc. v. Int'l Union, United Auto. Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers of Am.

    107 F.3d 1052 (3d Cir. 1997)   Cited 15 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that “the majority expands the exception such that the rule is rendered a nullity”

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Miller Waste Mills

    315 F.3d 951 (8th Cir. 2003)   Cited 8 times

    No. 01-3073. Submitted: October 7, 2002. Filed: January 10, 2003. David A. Seid, argued, Washington, DC (Sharon I. Block, Arthur F. Rosenfeld, John E. Higgins, Jr., John H. Ferguson, Aileen A. Armstrong, on the brief), for petitioner. Lee A. Lastovich, argued, Minneapolis, MN (Paul J. Zech, on the brief), for respondent. Before HANSEN, Chief Judge, and HEANEY and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions this court to enforce its order