§

Michael F. Longo, Complainant, v. Dr. James G. Roche, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

01A24811 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 23, 2003)
Michael F. Longo, Complainant, v. Dr. James G. Roche, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 241,064 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 220,495 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

  3. Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corp.

    846 F.2d 103 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 413 times
    Holding that discharge over two and one half years after employee filed EEOC complaint was insufficient showing of retaliation to avoid summary judgment for employer

  4. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 335,924 times   161 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit