§

Laredo Coca Cola Bottling Co.

241 N.L.R.B. 167 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
Laredo Coca Cola Bottling Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allied Products Corp.

    548 F.2d 644 (6th Cir. 1977)   Cited 70 times
    In NLRB v. Allied Prods. Corp., 548 F.2d 644 (6th Cir. 1977), the court upheld the NLRB's conclusion that the discontinuance of an annual review program violated the Act, while in NLRB v. Dothan Eagle, Inc., 434 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1970), the raises at issue were not "totally discretionary" but rather "automatic progression wage increases" of "10 to 15 cents per hour" that "were regularly granted every six months."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. W. C. McQuaide, Inc.

    552 F.2d 519 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 40 times
    In McQuaide, supra, we stated flatly: "Rather than focus on either the subjective intent of the striker or the perception of the `victim,' we adopt an objective standard to determine whether conduct constitutes a threat sufficiently egregious to justify" the imposition of sanctions by the employer.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Craw

    565 F.2d 1267 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 11 times
    In Craw, it was noted that the NLRB, in issuing a bargaining order, did not discuss the particular reasons for the remedy, but instead adopted in toto the ALJ's rulings, findings and conclusions.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Nello Pistoresi Son, Inc.

    500 F.2d 399 (9th Cir. 1974)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that Christmas bonus was not established policy partly because employer used no formula to compute bonus; distinguishing earlier case partly on ground that bonus program there was tied to employees' seniority

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Niles-Bement-Pond

    199 F.2d 713 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 20 times
    Upholding a Board finding that a Christmas bonus paid "over a substantial period of time and in amount . . . based on the respective wages earned by the recipients" were "wages"