6 Cited authorities
SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.
397 U.S. 920 (1970) Cited 200 times 5 Legal AnalysesUpholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances
Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B
414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969) Cited 81 times 6 Legal AnalysesHolding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list
Janek v. Celebrezze
336 F.2d 828 (3d Cir. 1964) Cited 81 timesIn Janek v. Celebrezze, 336 F.2d 828 (3d Cir. 1964), it was held that the Secretary should have found for the claimant in accordance with the evidence indicating his inability to find work, or to show an adequate basis for concluding that he could have obtained light work by the exercise of reasonable diligence on his part.
Surkin v. Charteris
197 F.2d 77 (5th Cir. 1952) Cited 52 timesNo. 13629. May 23, 1952. Henry W. Krystow, Miami, Fla., for appellants. T.J. Blackwell, Samuel J. Powers, Jr., Miami, Fla., for appellee. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from a judgment for the defendant, Leslie Charteris, on a complaint brought by an eleven year old boy, Marvin Surkin, and his mother, Betty Surkin, to recover damages for injuries sustained as a result of an accident involving a bicycle, on which Marvin was
Montgomery v. Ellis
364 F. Supp. 517 (N.D. Ala. 1973) Cited 16 timesCiv. A. No. 71-644. September 11, 1973. Earle Montgomery, pro se. Robert R. Reid, Jr., and Allen Poppleton, Bradley, Arant, Rose White, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff. Wayman G. Sherrer, U.S. Atty., William D. Mallard, Jr., Charles Stewart, Asst. U.S. Attys., Birmingham, Ala., for W.B. Lingle and C.W. Friday. George F. Wooten, Dixon, Wooten, Boyett McCrary, Talladega, Ala., for John R. Ellis, and C.B. Munroe. FINAL ORDER OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT GUIN, District Judge. This action is brought to enjoin
Securities Exch. Com'n v. Geyser Minerals
452 F.2d 876 (10th Cir. 1971) Cited 15 timesExplaining that "even in antitrust litigation, if the pertinent area of law is well developed and the case turns on documentary evidence, disposition by summary judgment may be appropriate" (citing White Motor Co. , 372 U.S. at 259, 83 S.Ct. 696 )