§

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 18, AFL-CIO (Precision Pipeline)

362 NLRB No. 176 (N.L.R.B. 2015)
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 18, AFL-CIO (Precision Pipeline)

12 Cited authorities

  1. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,207 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

  2. Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill

    499 U.S. 65 (1991)   Cited 1,075 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"

  3. San Diego Unions v. Garmon

    359 U.S. 236 (1959)   Cited 2,558 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"

  4. Steelworkers v. Rawson

    495 U.S. 362 (1990)   Cited 571 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that union could contractually undertake, in collective bargaining agreement, other duties towards member employees in addition to statutorily-imposed duty of fair representation

  5. Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers

    493 U.S. 67 (1989)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that failure of union to refer plaintiff for employment was not cognizable under the LMRDA because it did not involve "discipline"

  6. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 881 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  7. Steele v. L. N.R. Co.

    323 U.S. 192 (1944)   Cited 959 times
    Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc.

    326 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 98 times

    No. 73, Docket 26232. Argued October 21, 1963. Decided December 11, 1963. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Herman M. Levy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel J. Cohen, New York City (Jack Last and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Union. Ruth

  9. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.3d 1012 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 24 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting that in challenge to extra-unit fees, litigation expenses were "treated separately by the parties but [are] analytically identical, as far as we can see"

  10. Amburgey v. Consolidation Coal Co.

    923 F.2d 27 (4th Cir. 1991)   Cited 24 times
    Concluding that the UMW was not required to file a grievance it believed to be unwarranted

  11. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,569 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party