13676. APRIL 15, 1941. Petition for habeas corpus. Before Judge Humphries. Fulton superior court. December 10, 1940. James R. Venable, E. W. Fountain, B. J. Dantone, and Frank A. Bowers, for plaintiff. John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, and E. A. Stephens, for defendant. 1. The authority to pardon, conferred upon the Governor by the constitution (Code, § 2-2612), includes the power to attach any condition precedent or subsequent which is not illegal, immoral, or impossible of performance

No. 129. August 9, 1945. Joseph A. Cirillo, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for relator. Charles F. Uhl, U.S. Atty., and Edward C. Boyle, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent. Habeas corpus proceeding by the United States of America, on the relation of Lenzi Forino, against Eric C. Bromberg, Acting Officer in Charge, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Pittsburgh. Writ of habeas corpus vacated and relator ordered to surrender to Immigration Officer. GIBSON, District Judge. Lenzi Forino

13739. JUNE 17, 1941. Petition for habeas corpus. Before Judge Hendrix. Fulton superior court. March 12, 1941. A. G. Smith and J. C. Bowden, for plaintiff. John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, Bond Almand, solicitor, and Durwood T. Pye, for defendants. In this proceeding for the writ of habeas corpus, under the allegations of the petition and the evidence presented on the trial, it was not error to remand the applicant to the custody of the superintendent of public works. No. 13739. JUNE 17, 1941.

No. A-3873 Opinion Filed November 27, 1920. 1. PRISONS — Computing Good Time and Work Time — Prisoner Serving Separate Sentences. Where a convicted person is committed to the state penitentiary under four separate sentences, providing that the term of imprisonment of the second or subsequent conviction should begin at the termination of the term of imprisonment of the next preceding conviction, it is the duty of the warden in computing the good time and work time to be allowed such prisoner to compute