In the Matter of Moreira

16 Cited authorities

  1. Miller v. United States

    317 U.S. 192 (1942)   Cited 65 times
    In Miller v. United States, 1942, 317 U.S. 192, 197, 63 S.Ct. 187, 190, 87 L.Ed. 179, the court said that the statute, "applies only to court costs, permits the taking of an appeal without prepayment of cost of printing the record in the appellate court, and provides in certain cases for the printing of that record at Government expense. It does not authorize the procurement of a transcript of the testimony nor the payment for services in reporting evidence taken at the trial nor for the obtaining of it by the Government in behalf of an indigent defendant."
  2. Rutkowski v. Wasko

    286 AD 327 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that a person stands in loco parentis to a child if he or she assumes all the obligations incident to the parental relationship and actually discharges those obligations
  3. State v. Gillaspie

    8 Wn. App. 560 (Wash. Ct. App. 1973)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that the relationship of stepparent and stepchild confers no rights and imposes no duties upon either unless a child is taken into the home of the stepparent and the relationship of in loco parentis established
  4. Taylor v. Taylor

    58 Wn. 2d 510 (Wash. 1961)   Cited 23 times
    Recognizing that in loca parentis status is temporary based on the intent of the party assuming the obligation
  5. London Guarantee Accident Co. Ltd. v. Smith

    242 Minn. 211 (Minn. 1954)   Cited 32 times
    Extending parental immunity to a stepfather who was in loco parentis and explaining that to do otherwise would be contrary to public policy in that it would "discourage a stepfather from voluntarily assuming the unselfish, in loco parentis position to a child in need of parental care"
  6. Miller v. United States

    123 F.2d 715 (Conn. Cir. Ct. 1942)   Cited 45 times
    Determining parental status "at the time of the kidnapping"
  7. McManus v. Hinney

    151 N.W.2d 44 (Wis. 1967)   Cited 13 times

    May 11, 1967. — June 6, 1967. APPEAL from a judgment and amended judgment of the circuit court for Dodge county: HENRY G. GERGEN, JR., Circuit Judge. Affirmed. For the appellant there was a brief by Robert G. Hartman of Juneau, attorney, and W. Scott Van Alstyne, Jr., of Madison of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Van Alstyne. For the respondents there was a brief by Jack McManus, attorney, and Larry Haukom of counsel, both of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. McManus. Action by Thomas Ponce and

  8. Brummitt v. Commonwealth

    357 S.W.2d 37 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962)   Cited 10 times

    May 1, 1962. Appeal from the Harlan Circuit Court, Edward C. Hill, J. J.C. Helton, Grant F. Knuckles, Pineville, for appellant. John B. Breckinridge, Atty. Gen., Joe Nagle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee. STANLEY, Commissioner. Appellant, Nadine Brummitt, was indicted for deserting her three children under conditions defined in KRS 435.240. The trial court directed an acquittal in relation to two of the children and submitted the case to the jury as to the defendant's son, Jerry Wayne

  9. Nation v. Esperdy

    239 F. Supp. 531 (S.D.N.Y. 1965)   Cited 5 times
    In Nation, the beneficiary was born out of wedlock to the plaintiff's future husband and another woman in Kingston, Jamaica, on February 12, 1947.
  10. State v. White

    116 Ohio App. 522 (Ohio Ct. App. 1962)   Cited 7 times

    No. 2655 Decided January 20, 1962. Criminal law — Child stealing — Evidence — Custody of child — Child's mother may testify against accused husband — Proof of motive — Commission of other offenses — Judicial notice — Stepparent not in loco parentis to stepchild. 1. In a prosecution for child stealing, where the child was the accused's stepson who was living with his mother who had been divorced from the child's father, testimony by the mother that she had been given custody of the child at the divorce

  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,635 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  12. Section 1153 - Allocation of immigrant visas

    8 U.S.C. § 1153   Cited 1,217 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Determining an applicant's age as " the age of the alien on the date on which an immigrant visa number becomes available for such alien . . . but only if the alien has sought to acquire the status of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence within one year of such availability; reduced by (B) the number of days in the period during which the applicable petition . . . was pending"