§
In the Matter of M

9 Cited authorities

  1. Miller v. United States

    317 U.S. 192 (1942)   Cited 65 times
    In Miller v. United States, 1942, 317 U.S. 192, 197, 63 S.Ct. 187, 190, 87 L.Ed. 179, the court said that the statute, "applies only to court costs, permits the taking of an appeal without prepayment of cost of printing the record in the appellate court, and provides in certain cases for the printing of that record at Government expense. It does not authorize the procurement of a transcript of the testimony nor the payment for services in reporting evidence taken at the trial nor for the obtaining of it by the Government in behalf of an indigent defendant."

  2. Lipham v. State

    257 Ga. 808 (Ga. 1988)   Cited 38 times
    Applying rape statute instead of necrophilia statute to factual situation in which it was unclear whether defendant killed victim before raping her

  3. Jones v. Jones

    161 Misc. 660 (N.Y. Dom. Rel. Ct. 1937)   Cited 13 times
    In Jones v Jones (161 Misc. 660, 663) the court referred to the dictionary to define the term, step, and said that Webster's Dictionary defines it as "`a prefix used before father, mother, brother, sister, son, daughter, child, etc., to indicate that the person thus spoken of is not a blood relative, but is a relative only by marriage of a parent'" (emphasis supplied).

  4. Dangerfield v. Indemnity Ins. Co.

    19 So. 2d 598 (La. Ct. App. 1945)   Cited 4 times

    No. 2662. November 9, 1944. Rehearing Denied December 13, 1944. Writ of Error Granted January 15, 1945. Appeal from Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge; Chas. A. Holcombe, Judge. Suit by Josephine Dangerfield against Indemnity Insurance Company to recover compensation in the sum of $6,000 representing compensation in weekly payments of $20 for 300 weeks in behalf of plaintiff and her two illegitimate minor children, less amount already paid, by virtue of the death of plaintiff's

  5. Matter of Larsen v. Harris Structural Steel Co.

    230 A.D. 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)   Cited 17 times
    In Harris v. Larsen, 24 Utah 139, 66 P. 782, we held that a seller of land who agreed to accept a certain number of hogs as part of the purchase price but did not receive the full number and obtained judgment for failure to deliver the hogs, to satisfy his judgment might levy execution on the land even though it be claimed by the buyer as a homestead because the debt grew out of the sale of the land.

  6. Brotherhood of Locomotive F. and E. v. Hogan

    5 F. Supp. 598 (D. Minn. 1934)   Cited 9 times
    In Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Engineers v. Hogan, 5 F. Supp. 598 (1934), the issue was whether stepchildren were entitled to benefits under their former stepfather's insurance policy.

  7. Sharp v. Vineland

    117 N.J.L. 598 (N.J. 1937)   Cited 6 times

    Submitted October 20, 1936 — Decided February 13, 1937. The term "dependents" as specified in section 12 of the amendment to the Workmen's Compensation act in Pamph. L. 1928, ch. 135, does not include children illegitimately born to a woman before her marriage to the deceased employe, who was not the father of the children. On writ of certiorari. Before BROGAN, CHIEF JUSTICE, and Justices CASE and PERSKIE. For the prosecutor, William C. Gotshalk and Phillip P. Wodlinger. For the respondents, Ralph

  8. Simpson v. State Compensation Commissioner

    114 W. Va. 814 (W. Va. 1934)   Cited 7 times

    No. 7864 Submitted April 10, 1934. Decided April 17, 1934. Appeal from State Compensation Commissioner. Proceedings under the Workmen's Compensation Law by Mamie Simpson and another. From a ruling of the State Compensation Commissioner awarding compensation to Mamie Simpson, as the dependent widow, but denying compensation to a child, an appeal was taken. Reversed. Brown W. Payne, for appellant. Homer A. Holt, Attorney General, and Kenneth E. Hines, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. HATCHER

  9. Lunceford v. Fegles Construction Co.

    185 Minn. 31 (Minn. 1931)   Cited 9 times

    No. 28,616. December 18, 1931. Workmen's compensation act — dependent entitled to benefits as stepchild of deceased employe. The relator was an illegitimate child. The deceased employe married her mother. The decedent and his wife and the daughter lived together, the deceased supported the child, and she was treated as his child, was one of the family, and was dependent upon him. The decedent was killed under circumstances entitling his dependents to an award. Held that the daughter was a stepchild