§
IN THE MATTER OF LI

7 Cited authorities

  1. United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod

    263 U.S. 149 (1923)   Cited 345 times
    Holding that there is no "presumption of citizenship comparable to the presumption of innocence in a criminal case. . . . To defeat deportation it is not always enough for the person arrested to stand mute at the hearing and put the Government upon its proof."

  2. La Franca v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    413 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 15 times
    Finding that the agency properly refused to reopen the petitioner's deportation hearing, based, in part, on the fact that, even assuming the unlawfulness of his arrest, it relied upon the concession of deportability by his counsel at the hearing and not “any statements taken or evidence seized at the time of his arrest”

  3. Guzman-Flores v. U.S. Immigration Nat. Serv

    496 F.2d 1245 (7th Cir. 1974)   Cited 7 times

    No. 73-1313, 73-1525. Heard April 9, 1974. Decided May 28, 1974. Ralph M. Schelly, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners. Mary Jo Grotenrath, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., James R. Thompson, U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before SWYGERT, Chief Judge, SPRECHER, Circuit Judge and NOLAND, District Judge District Judge James E. Noland of the Southern District of Indiana is sitting by designation. NOLAND, District Judge. These

  4. Solis-Davila v. I.N.S.

    456 F.2d 424 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 7 times

    No. 71-2620. Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N.Y., 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970). March 1, 1972. Albert Armendariz, Sr., El Paso, Tex., for petitioner. John N. Mitchell, Atty. Gen. of U.S., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Troy A. Adams, Jr., District Director, I.N.S., New Orleans, La., William S. Sessions, U.S. Atty., Hugh P. Shoulin, Asst. U.S. Atty., El Paso, Tex., for respondent. Petition for review from the Immigration and

  5. Vlisidis v. Holland

    245 F.2d 812 (3d Cir. 1957)   Cited 10 times
    In Vlisidis v. Holland, 3 Cir., 245 F.2d 812, at page 814, Circuit Judge Hastie said: "Actually, it was necessary to show only the single fact that the respondent was an alien, for, once that is proved, the legislative scheme requires the alien to justify his presence within the United States. 66 Stat. 234, 8 U.S.C. § 1361."

  6. Williams v. Mulcahey

    250 F.2d 127 (6th Cir. 1957)   Cited 4 times

    No. 13119. November 7, 1957. Goodman, Crockett, Eden Robb, Detroit, Mich., for appellant. Fred W. Kaess, Dwight K. Hamborsky, U.S. Attys., Detroit, Mich., Charles Gordon, Regional Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, St. Paul, Minn., for appellee. Before McALLISTER, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing a complaint seeking injunctive relief from an order of deportation (sub nom. Williams v. Butterfield, D.C.D.E

  7. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable