In the Matter of Laqui

28 Cited authorities

  1. Woodby v. Immigration Service

    385 U.S. 276 (1966)   Cited 753 times
    Holding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"
  2. Harisiades v. Shaughnessy

    342 U.S. 580 (1952)   Cited 569 times
    Holding that the Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to deportation orders because "[d]eportation, however severe its consequences, has been consistently classified as a civil rather than a criminal procedure"
  3. Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath

    339 U.S. 33 (1950)   Cited 446 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Administrative Procedure Act required deportation hearings even though current INS regulations did not
  4. Galvan v. Press

    347 U.S. 522 (1954)   Cited 389 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while aliens may receive procedural due process, the court's ability to review the substantive policy of immigration statutes is limited to review for rationality
  5. Marcello v. Bonds

    349 U.S. 302 (1955)   Cited 257 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it does not violate due process to have an adjudicator who is "subject to the supervision and control of officials in the Immigration Service charged with investigative and prosecuting functions"
  6. Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan

    333 U.S. 6 (1948)   Cited 206 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting government's definition of provision authorizing deportation for multiple criminal convictions
  7. United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod

    263 U.S. 149 (1923)   Cited 345 times
    Holding that there is no "presumption of citizenship comparable to the presumption of innocence in a criminal case. . . . To defeat deportation it is not always enough for the person arrested to stand mute at the hearing and put the Government upon its proof."
  8. Mahler v. Eby

    264 U.S. 32 (1924)   Cited 232 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government failed to comply "with all the statutory requirements"
  9. Fong Yue Ting v. United States

    149 U.S. 698 (1893)   Cited 467 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the political branches could deport residents based solely on their race and deem all people of "the Chinese race" incompetent to sign the affidavit needed for Chinese immigrants to remain lawfully
  10. Lehmann v. Carson

    353 U.S. 685 (1957)   Cited 47 times
    Finding it "indisputable" that Congress intended to legislate retrospectively when it provided for deportation of those who committed specified crimes "at any time after entry"
  11. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 98,903 times   679 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  12. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable