In the Matter of Grijalva

6 Cited authorities

  1. INS v. Lopez-Mendoza

    468 U.S. 1032 (1984)   Cited 991 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "deportation is not to punish past transgressions but rather to put an end to a continuing violation of the immigration laws."
  2. Woodby v. Immigration Service

    385 U.S. 276 (1966)   Cited 753 times
    Holding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"
  3. United States v. Herrera-Medina

    609 F.2d 376 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 20 times

    No. 79-1071. December 6, 1979. Gerald S. Frank, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee. Fredric F. Kay, Tucson, Ariz., argued for defendant-appellant; Frank R. Zapata, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Tucson, Ariz., on the brief. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, District Judge. The Honorable James M. Fitzgerald, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation

  4. Reid v. I.N.S.

    756 F.2d 7 (3d Cir. 1985)   Cited 6 times
    Rejecting alien's claims that seven-year period in § 212(c) continues to accrue until the alien actually departs from the country pursuant to a lawful order of deportation; unnecessary to decide at what point lawful domicile terminated because even under Ninth Circuit's Wall rule alien did not meet seven-year requirement
  5. Section 802 - Definitions

    21 U.S.C. § 802   Cited 4,053 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Excluding hemp from the schedules
  6. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable