In the Matter of Grandi

9 Cited authorities

Accardi v. Shaughnessy
347 U.S. 260 (1954) Cited 889 times
Holding that Board of Immigration Appeals was required to follow its own regulations in deciding whether to suspend deportation
Service v. Dulles
354 U.S. 363 (1957) Cited 580 times
Holding that "[w]hile the Secretary was not obligated to impose upon himself these more rigorous substantive and procedural standards . . . having done so he could not, so long as the Regulations remained unchanged, proceed without regard to them"
Leng May Ma v. Barber
357 U.S. 185 (1958) Cited 211 times
Holding that an alien's parole into the United States "did not alter her status as an excluded alien"
United States v. Grandi
424 F.2d 399 (2d Cir. 1970) Cited 15 times
Indicating that in international travel the difference between departing and arriving is one of relativity, depending upon which country is examining the traveller; the police of the two countries often cooperate
Title v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
322 F.2d 21 (9th Cir. 1963) Cited 17 times
Holding that collateral estoppel "should not be exercised in such a manner as to work an injustice"
Aalund v. Marshall
323 F. Supp. 1380 (E.D. Tex. 1971) Cited 3 times
Civ. A. No. 6825. March 18, 1971. Alto V. Watson, Beaumont, Tex., for petitioners. Robert H. Nicholas, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Beaumont, Tex., for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOE J. FISHER, Chief Judge. Petitioners, Mary Moore Aalund, and her two minor children, Karen Elizabeth Aalund and Martin Peter Aalund, citizens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, and her minor son, Gordon Richard Aalund, and the father of the minor children, Carl Viggo Aalund, citizens of the United States
D'Agostino v. Sahli
230 F.2d 668 (5th Cir. 1956) Cited 3 times
No. 15667. March 14, 1956. Harold D. Putman, Putman Putman, William O. Murray, Jr., Joseph J. Reid, Richard G. Strong, San Antonio, Tex., for appellant. Harman Parrott, Asst. U.S. Atty., Russell B. Wine, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for appellee. Before BORAH, TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit Judge. By his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the appellant, Antoine D'Agostino, challenged the legality of his detention by certain officials in San Antonio, Texas. Petitioner alleged
Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
8 U.S.C. § 1182 Cited 9,870 times 69 Legal Analyses
Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
Section 1225 - Inspection by immigration officers; expedited removal of inadmissible arriving aliens; referral for hearing
8 U.S.C. § 1225 Cited 1,293 times 16 Legal Analyses
Setting standard for credible fear as "a significant possibility, taking into account the ... statements made by the alien ... and such other facts as are known to the officer, that the alien could establish eligibility for asylum"

In the Matter of Grandi

9 Cited authorities

Holding that Board of Immigration Appeals was required to follow its own regulations in deciding whether to suspend deportation

Holding that "[w]hile the Secretary was not obligated to impose upon himself these more rigorous substantive and procedural standards . . . having done so he could not, so long as the Regulations remained unchanged, proceed without regard to them"

Holding that an alien's parole into the United States "did not alter her status as an excluded alien"

Indicating that in international travel the difference between departing and arriving is one of relativity, depending upon which country is examining the traveller; the police of the two countries often cooperate

Holding that collateral estoppel "should not be exercised in such a manner as to work an injustice"

Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

Setting standard for credible fear as "a significant possibility, taking into account the ... statements made by the alien ... and such other facts as are known to the officer, that the alien could establish eligibility for asylum"